Pew! Something Stinks: the Disappearing American Middle Class

Anyone who is surprised by the recent Pew Research Center report that the American middle class is “losing ground” hasn’t been paying attention.

Even Helen Keller could have seen this coming. According to the report, the rich keep getting obscenely richer. You don’t say! Another shocker: more than a quarter of adult Americans 65 or older improved their bottom lines (26.7 percent), while many of the rest of us have been bleeding out financially.Pew Research_Middle Class

Ah, yes, the postwar “me-me-me generation” of baby boomers; the generation that was in charge in the ‘90s. Some of their notable achievements:

  • Supporting job-busting “trade” agreements (NAFTA, CAFTA, GATT, et al.), which laid the groundwork for the even more suicidal TPP
  • They converted the personal-sounding term “personnel” into the more disposable-sounding “human resources”…morphed “hiring” into “onboarding” … and turned “firing” into the sterile “offboarding” or murderous “terminating”
  • And now, many won’t retire, even when they are comfortable financially, making an already tight labor market even less accessible to the rest of us

Me-me-me to the end.

The study also showed that from 1970-2015, adult blacks saw a larger increase in income than any other racial or ethnic group (up 11.2 percent), and blacks were also the only group not to experience a decline in their lower-income share. See? Sometimes black lives do matter!

Married people with or without children at home also fared much better than single people. That makes sense, since it now takes two salaries to equal half of what one salary was worth 10 years ago.

Pew defines middle class Americans as adults whose annual income is double to two-thirds of the national median wage. In 1971, 61 percent of adult Americans enjoyed middle class status; that rate has plunged to only 50 percent now. The number of high income American adults spiked from 14 percent to 21 percent, and the number of low income households also increased (from 25 percent to 29 percent).

All in all, the study further validates Ross Perot’s “giant sucking sound” prediction. In 1992, he warned that America’s labor market would be destroyed if NAFTA passed; how right he was. The report charts the decline of our middle class beginning in the early ‘90s and accelerating considerably in the ‘00s.

By then, NAFTA was really kicking into gear and virtually all of our manufacturing jobs were exported overseas. I just hope that Chinese factory workers can take a break from making our iPhones every once in a while to make enough respirators for the citizens of Beijing. Sure, let’s cry for the polar bears while our captains of industry suffocate the poor Chinese people with low-cost, unregulated manufacturing and limited breathable air.

With our manufacturing gone, our labor market now consists primarily of very high- or very low-skilled occupations.

But, wait, there’s more!

In recent years, our crooked Congressional “representatives” continued to beat the walking dead middle class by boosting the number of tech “guest” work visas granted to their corporate sponsors.  U.S. workers in high-skilled positions are now routinely replaced by foreign “guests” who are paid much less.

Congress also has allowed an endless parade of illegal aliens to cross our open boarder and they are now calling for us to import Syrian refugees to fill the low-skilled jobs that Americans supposed won’t do. It’s clear that the psychopaths running our government are fast-tracking us to Third World status. And…we’re…letting…them. Why?

Each holiday season, retailers bemoan the fact that people aren’t spending as much as they used to. Well, if we don’t have jobs, or the jobs we have pay less they used to, or we are “gig” employees who don’t know if or when we’ll see another paycheck, then the odds are pretty good that we’re not going to have a lot of Benjamins…or bitcoins…or any type of digital currency…to slide across your registers or online shopping carts.

In my last post, I described how today’s U.S. worker is trapped in an environment of economic cannibalism; the Pew study proves it.

Pew. Something sure does stink around here.

 

Big Brother and the BYOD Privacy Holding Company

I have a friend who works for CSX, one of the nation’s largest rail and transport companies. Like a lot of companies today, CSX won’t provide most of their employees with company cell phones, but it still expects workers to have access to their work email at all times; in the spirit of “BYOB” (bring your own booze), this cost-effective trend is called “bring your own device” (BYOD).

You might be saying, “What’s wrong with that? We’ve had our work email on our cell phones for years.” Well, in their zeal to keep employees tethered to the job around the clock without incurring the cost of providing them with a company cell phone, CSX, like many companies,  want their employees to add a mobile device management (MDM) platform to their personal devices that  violates their right to privacy….all for the sake of protecting their corporate data.

Yes, CSX is considering having their employees sign on to an Orwellian corporate mobility policy that gives their IT department explicit consent to potentially install apps, monitor usage, track, wipe data, oh…and collect personal information from their phones or tablets.

So…that Tinder app…those embarrassing Pinterest or Facebook pictures you posted when you were drunk? Guess what CSX’s (or your company’s) HR department may be perusing when they’re bored?

Having access to your personal information could be helpful when a mass layoff is necessary. Was your inclusion in the culled herd really nothing personal, or did an offensive app on your phone do you in? You’ll never know.

Your phone, your data? Not necessarily

Privacy is only one consideration when it comes to BYOD; there’s always the potential for data wipes. A man in Texas is currently suing his former employer for doing just that. Saman Rajaee had registered his iPhone with his employer’s Microsoft Exchange server.

A few days after giving two weeks’ notice, the company, Design Tech, wiped out all of the business and personal data on his phone…without warning, he lost more than 600 business and personal contacts, family photos, business records, and passwords. How’s that for a sendoff?

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas dismissed the federal charges brought by Rajaee, saying that Design Tech had not violated the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) and Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) when they nuked all of the data on his phone. The state charges of misappropriation of confidential information, violation of the Texas Theft Liability Act, negligence, and conversion, are still pending.

MDM software development companies like MobileIron are holding this case up as a warning to companies that they better CYA on the BYOD by getting their employees to sign ironclad BYOD consent forms….oh, and to promote the fact that their software helps companies delete only business data on employee  devices.

Employee apathy vs. convenience

Why do so many of us willingly embrace BYOD programs, despite the risks involved, especially when it’s common knowledge that most MDM platforms can access personal information from a user’s device? Is convenience that important?

According to a 2013 Harris Interactive survey, only 15 percent of those surveyed were concerned about privacy issues, although, four out of five respondents were concerned that MDM software would be used to track them.

We’ve been so systematically conditioned to having our privacy violated routinely, Snowden be damned, that we don’t even blink when CSX and other companies disregard our most precious right in order to protect their data.

Look at the permissions that most mobile apps request now. They want access to your microphone, your camera, your Bluetooth connection information, your device & app history, your location, SMS, photos/media/files, and your Wi-Fi connection…even when the app in question has no need for any of these functions.

Many of us just blindly accept these terms, because we have to have Instagram, Snapchat, or Tinder on our phones or tablets. Don’t even get me started on the privacy sins of Google+ and Facebook.

How many well-publicized, massive security breaches will it take before we realize that granting intrusive (and often unnecessary) permissions without giving it a second thought may not be such a good idea?  Are we ever going to wake up and draw a line in the sand?  We better.

It’s bad enough to make your phone or tablet vulnerable to some criminal app developer or offshore hacker, but when your privacy is violated by your employer, the pee isn’t coming out of that swimming pool, so BYOD at your own risk.